Spam canned meat salesUS dog treat and chew market revenue
It turns out that Americans have collectively decided that the more processed pork product they consume in rectangular metal containers, the more their dogs require specialized mastication experiences, and this decision has held firm for thirteen years with the kind of mathematical certainty usually reserved for planetary orbits. One might expect the pet industry and the Spam industry to operate in entirely separate universes, pursuing their own peculiar destinies, but instead they have been moving in almost perfect synchronization, like two dancers who have never met but somehow learned the same routine. The universe, it seems, does not so much abhor a vacuum as it abhors statistical independence.
Both are panic-buying stories with different protagonists. Spam sales spiked in early 2020 as households stockpiled shelf-stable protein during the first lockdowns, while dog-treat revenue surged as pandemic pet adoption and guilty remote-working owners spoiled new animals rotten. Different shelves, same anxious spring.
What we have stumbled upon is less a revelation about Spam or dog treats and more an unintentional portrait of American spending patterns, rendered accidentally in processed meat and rubber toys. The correlation is real, the causation is almost certainly not, and somewhere in that gap lives the actual story. Neither product knows the other exists, yet they move together like old married couples.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Spam canned meat sales” vs “US dog treat and chew market revenue” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.