Taylor Swift annual Spotify streamsQuantum physics papers on arXiv per year
As quantum physicists have published more papers per year, Taylor Swift's Spotify streams have grown with the kind of exponential trajectory that suggests she may have discovered something about superposition that the physicists have not. The correlation is 0.951 across six data points, which is barely enough to fit a line through and more than enough to inspire a headline. One imagines a physicist listening to "Anti-Hero" while writing about entanglement and feeling, for a moment, that both activities are exploring the same mystery. They are not. But the feeling persists.
Quantum papers on arXiv grew steadily from about 12,000 per year in 2017 to over 16,000 by 2024, powered by quantum computing investment and the field's growing academic workforce. Taylor Swift's Spotify streams went from roughly 5 billion per year to over 26 billion during the same period, driven by her Eras Tour (the highest-grossing tour in history), strategic re-recordings of her catalog, and the sheer momentum of being the most famous musician on Earth during a period of streaming dominance. Both curves are measuring exponential growth in their respective domains, and six data points of two things going up at the same time is the statistical equivalent of noting that the sun also rose on both phenomena.
Six data points of quantum papers and Taylor Swift streams is a dataset so small it barely qualifies as evidence of anything, and yet the correlation is strong enough to make you pause. Both are measuring peak cultural moments in different domains: physics is having its quantum decade, and Swift is having her decade, full stop. The Eras overlap. The correlation is coincidental. The album, however, is quite good.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Taylor Swift annual Spotify streams” vs “Quantum physics papers on arXiv per year” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.