MrBeast YouTube subscribers

It appears that somewhere around 2016, the universe decided that MrBeast's ascent to YouTube dominance and the exponential proliferation of machine learning research papers would rise in perfect, inexplicable tandem, as though both were being inflated by the same invisible hand. One tracks a man's ability to convince millions that opening boxes is entertainment. The other tracks humanity's collective attempt to build a replacement for thinking. They have correlated at 0.996, which is to say they are almost certainly not related at all.

What's likely happening here is that both phenomena ride the same three waves: the explosive growth of internet infrastructure (more creators could broadcast, more researchers could publish), the rising cultural and economic value of attention itself (which rewards both viral entertainment and cutting-edge AI papers with funding and eyeballs), and the simple fact that 2016-2024 was an era when both YouTube and artificial intelligence stopped being niche interests and became civilisational preoccupations. Add to this the peculiar truth that arXiv publishing has grown at roughly 15-20% per year regardless of actual scientific breakthrough—it's become the default way physicists and computer scientists stake claims—while MrBeast's subscriber count has grown in the 30-50% range annually, and you've got two things expanding furiously in a period when digital attention itself became the world's most abundant resource. Neither caused the other. Both were caused by the fact that we collectively built an infrastructure for measuring and rewarding them.

The real lesson is that the internet doesn't create correlations so much as it makes them visible and preserves them in spreadsheets for people like us to find at three in the morning. MrBeast and machine learning papers will probably stop moving in lockstep sometime soon, and we will feel faintly betrayed, as though we'd discovered a secret the universe was keeping. Until then, they are joined at the hip by nothing more sinister than timing and our hunger for scale.