MrBeast YouTube subscribersQuantum physics papers on arXiv per year
It appears that as MrBeast accumulated subscribers by filming himself giving away money to increasingly bewildered members of the public, quantum physicists were independently becoming more productive, as if the universe itself had decided to match his energy through the peer-reviewed literature. One suspects neither group was aware of the other's ambitions. The correlation sits at 0.968, which is the kind of number that makes a statistician's eye twitch.
What's probably happening is that both trends are riding the same invisible wave: the exponential expansion of internet culture and global academic infrastructure. YouTube's user base grew from about 1.5 billion to over 2.5 billion between 2016 and 2024, creating the vast audience pool from which MrBeast drew his subscribers. Simultaneously, international research funding increased, academic publishing became more accessible and encouraged through citation metrics, and more researchers gained reliable internet access to submit papers. Throw in the fact that quantum physics became fashionable in popular culture around the same time—blockchain, quantum computing, the whole techno-mystical moment—and suddenly both the entertainer and the scientists had tailwinds.
What we are looking at is not causation but rather two different human activities accelerating together because the world got richer, more connected, and slightly more obsessed with quantifying everything. Neither MrBeast nor the physicists caused the other's rise. They are both passengers on a much larger trend, and the fact that they moved in lockstep says something less about any deeper connection and more about how many things in modern life are now correlated with internet growth. The universe did not choose sides. We simply started measuring both.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “MrBeast YouTube subscribers” vs “Quantum physics papers on arXiv per year” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.