Languages on Google TranslateQuantum physics papers on arXiv per year
It turns out that the number of languages Google thinks it can translate and the number of physicists frantically publishing papers about quantum mechanics move together with the kind of eerie synchronicity usually reserved for twins separated at birth and reunited at a bus station. One might assume these have absolutely nothing to do with each other, which is precisely what makes their 95% correlation so quietly unsettling. We have accidentally discovered that linguists and quantum physicists are the same person, operating on different planes of reality.
The actual explanation, which is somehow more interesting than the conspiracy, is almost certainly that both metrics are measuring the same underlying phenomenon: internet expansion and the globalisation of knowledge-sharing among educated populations. Between 2010 and 2024, the world added roughly two billion internet users, and suddenly translation became both more valuable and more feasible, while simultaneously, the democratisation of academic publishing meant that a physicist in Mumbai or São Paulo could upload their work to arXiv as easily as one in Cambridge. The shared driver here is probably technological infrastructure and economic development, which tends to enable both language digitisation projects and the leisure time required to ponder whether particles are waves or just very enthusiastic about existing.
We are all pattern-seekers in a universe that is, by and large, just one thing causing another thing in a chain so long we gave up mapping it years ago. The correlation between translation capacity and quantum papers is almost certainly not mystical but rather the shadow of something larger: the internet itself, growing outward and upward, dragging human knowledge along behind it like a comet tail. Neither languages nor quantum papers know they are dancing together.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Languages on Google Translate” vs “Quantum physics papers on arXiv per year” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.