Electric vehicles registered in the USFAA-licensed commercial space launches
It is a curious feature of the universe that as Americans have begun strapping themselves into vehicles powered by electrons harvested from the grid, they have simultaneously developed an irresistible urge to launch commercial rockets into the void, and these two impulses have moved in near-perfect tandem for the past twelve years. One might imagine these phenomena to be utterly unrelated—the electric car emerging from decades of incremental battery chemistry and regulatory pressure, the commercial space industry from a mixture of billionaire ambition and venture capital looking for somewhere interesting to explode money—and yet here they are, moving together like a pair of dancers who have never met but somehow know all the steps. This suggests either that we have stumbled upon a fundamental law of physics previously overlooked by actual physicists, or that humanity's talent for finding meaningful patterns in noise may be even more impressive than we gave it credit for.
What likely binds these datasets is not some hidden cosmic principle but rather the straightforward fact that both depend on the same underlying current of technological optimism and disposable wealth flowing through the American economy between 2011 and 2022. The period witnessed a remarkable tightening of battery costs—lithium-ion pack prices fell from around $1,200 per kilowatt-hour in 2010 to roughly $140 by 2020, making electric vehicles genuinely competitive for the first time—while simultaneously the commercial space industry benefited from the same venture ecosystem and the same cultural permission to pursue what once seemed impossible. Both trends also tracked loosely with the post-2008 economic recovery and the specific years when policy incentives (tax credits for EVs, regulatory support for commercial launch licenses) came into effect. Put another way: a shared economic tide, rising policy support, and generational enthusiasm for technological solutions to existential problems lifted both boats, and they happened to rise at almost exactly the same rate, which is interesting in the way a perfectly shuffled coincidence can be, which is to say mildly and uncertainly.
The real lesson here is less about the datasets themselves than about how readily we human beings will construct narratives from any two lines that happen to slope in the same direction, and how little that tendency tells us about actual causation. Electric vehicles and commercial space launches are not secretly twins separated at birth; they are both just passengers on the same wave of mid-decade technological optimism and economic recovery, which is a less satisfying explanation but probably the correct one. We are pattern-seeking creatures living in a universe full of patterns, some real and some merely resembling patterns, and the only honest thing to do is to remain pleasantly uncertain about which is which.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Electric vehicles registered in the US” vs “FAA-licensed commercial space launches” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.