Bald eagle nesting pairs in the USCrop circles reported in the UK
As America's bald eagle population recovered magnificently from near-extinction—a genuine conservation triumph—crop circles in the United Kingdom obligingly declined, as if the aliens responsible had read the Endangered Species Act and decided to show some respect. The inverse correlation of -0.9667 between 2005 and 2021 is, by any measure, the most patriotic finding in the history of data science. One imagines the eagles soaring over amber waves of grain, circling meaningfully, and the UK farmers waking up to find their fields suspiciously ungeometric. The eagles have not commented.
Bald eagle nesting pairs in the US grew from approximately 9,800 in 2005 to over 71,000 by the early 2020s, a direct result of DDT bans, habitat protection under the Endangered Species Act, and active conservation programs—one of the most successful wildlife recoveries in American history. Crop circle reports in the UK, meanwhile, declined from a peak in the late 1990s and early 2000s as the novelty wore off, media coverage diminished, and the original pranksters aged. Both series simply moved in opposite directions for entirely independent cultural and biological reasons across the same window.
Conservation biology and the enthusiasm of British hoaxers operate on completely separate causal chains. That their trends oppose each other is the universe's way of reminding us that data will find a pattern if you give it enough variables to sort through.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Bald eagle nesting pairs in the US” vs “Crop circles reported in the UK” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.