Restaurant spending per capitaBabies named Luna (US)
As restaurant spending per capita has grown, more babies have been named Luna, a correlation of 0.976 that connects the dining economy to celestial naming with the reservation confidence of a chart that treats prix fixe menus and birth certificates as equivalent documents produced by the same cultured, affluent household.
Restaurant spending grew from about $1,400 to over $2,500 per capita. Luna grew to over 7,500 per year. Both eighteen-year curves serving the same demographic: people who dine out regularly and name their children thoughtfully. The shared variable is the same affluent, culturally engaged consumer.
Eighteen years of restaurants and Luna is the same demographic story told through food and names: the household that spends on dining experiences also invests in distinctive naming, and both choices reflect the same cultural values. The meal is curated, the name is chosen, and both are served with intention.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Restaurant spending per capita” vs “Babies named Luna (US)” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.