Per capita wine consumptionBabies named Karen in the US
Between 2002 and 2022, the number of babies named Karen fell precipitously while per capita wine consumption rose, achieving an inverse r of -0.9745. The temptation to construct a causal narrative here is almost physically irresistible, but this publication is committed to statistical integrity. What is undeniable is that as Americans drank more wine, they named fewer children Karen, and the two trends move in lockstep with the precision of a very well-timed cultural transaction. The wine is not apologizing.
Wine consumption hit a record in 2020 as lockdowns turned living rooms into bars, while the name Karen hit a demographic nadir as covid-era confrontations — mask mandates, anti-vax standoffs, viral grocery-store videos — turned it into shorthand for pandemic-era grievance. One line captures what Americans were drinking; the other captures what they'd stopped naming their daughters.
Names carry cultural weight that accumulates over time until the weight becomes too heavy to bestow on a child. The wine consumption data simply confirms that the culture was moving in a particular direction, and the naming data confirms it was moving fast.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Per capita wine consumption” vs “Babies named Karen in the US” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.