Americans identifying as LGBTQ+Northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf population
It turns out that as Americans have felt increasingly comfortable identifying as LGBTQ+, the gray wolves of the Northern Rocky Mountains have experienced what can only be described as a parallel career renaissance, rising from near extinction in perfect synchronisation with this cultural shift, which suggests either that wolves are remarkably attuned to social progress or that the universe simply enjoys making statisticians feel clever for a few minutes before the actual explanation arrives.
The real story, as is often the case with correlations that make you pause mid-coffee, involves a third actor entirely: the American economy and its particular relationship with the West. From 2012 to 2022, rural and mountain communities experienced genuine economic shifts—some toward revitalisation, others toward precarity—which both enabled younger people to remain in or return to progressive urban centres (where LGBTQ+ identification rates are measurably higher) and simultaneously created conditions where stricter wolf protection policies could actually take hold without complete political collapse. Add to this the simple fact that both datasets rely on better measurement and willingness to report: in 2012, neither wolves nor queer Americans were being counted with quite the same enthusiasm they were by 2022. The wolf population grew from roughly 1,600 animals to over 1,700—not dramatic, but noticeable—while LGBTQ+ identification nearly doubled.
We are, all of us, pattern-recognition machines who occasionally mistake coincidence for causation, which is mostly harmless until it isn't. The wolves and the identity data moved together across a decade for reasons that have almost nothing to do with each other, yet everything to do with how we measure, count, and permit ourselves to change. Both populations were simply becoming visible.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Americans identifying as LGBTQ+” vs “Northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf population” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.