Average NFL player salaryAI papers published on arXiv per year
As AI researchers have published more papers on arXiv, NFL players have earned higher average salaries, a correlation that forces us to confront the uncomfortable possibility that the same economy values throwing a football and training a neural network with roughly equal enthusiasm. The coefficient is 0.903 across fourteen years, during which both metrics climbed with the relentless confidence of growth curves that have discovered what exponential means and intend to keep demonstrating it. The quarterback and the researcher: both chasing optimization, both funded by entities with more money than patience.
AI paper output grew from about 3,000 per year in 2010 to over 30,000 by 2023, powered by the deep learning revolution and subsequent waves of investment. NFL salaries grew from about 1.9 million to over 3.7 million average, driven by television contracts that now exceed 100 billion dollars in total value. Both are measures of money flowing into prestige industries: AI research attracts billions in venture capital and government grants, while the NFL attracts billions in advertising and media rights. The shared variable is simply the expanding American economy directing capital toward its most visible and prestigious outputs, whether those outputs are published on arXiv or broadcast on Sunday afternoons.
Fourteen years of AI papers and football salaries growing together is a portrait of an economy that rewards spectacle and intelligence with equal generosity, though it funds them through very different mechanisms. The papers are free to read, the games require a subscription, and both keep getting more expensive to produce. The algorithm optimizes, the quarterback scrambles, and the money flows to both.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Average NFL player salary” vs “AI papers published on arXiv per year” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.