Alibaba Singles Day salesAI papers published on arXiv per year
It appears that Chinese consumers and artificial intelligence researchers have been reading from the same script since 2010, which is either a remarkable coincidence or evidence that the universe enjoys a joke at our expense. Every November, as millions of people in China prepare to buy things they don't need, somewhere in the world a proportional number of researchers finish papers explaining why machines might one day buy things they don't need either. The correlation between Singles Day sales and arXiv AI submissions is so tight (0.962) that one begins to suspect the researchers are simply documenting their own shopping habits in mathematical form.
The real story, though, is probably less supernatural and more mundane—which in its own way is stranger. Both phenomena track the same underlying wave: the exponential growth of internet access, disposable income, and computational resources across the developed and developing world between 2010 and 2021. As more people came online and could both buy things and publish papers, both numbers climbed together like synchronized swimmers who'd never met. Consider that Alibaba's Singles Day sales grew from roughly $9 million in 2009 to $74 billion by 2021—an astronomical jump that roughly mirrors the tripling of arXiv submissions in the same period, suggesting we're watching two different expressions of the same underlying explosion in digital activity and prosperity.
What we've stumbled upon is not a causal relationship but a portrait of the 2010s: a period when technology, money, and human ambition all accelerated together in ways that made unrelated things move in tandem. The correlation tells us nothing about shopping or AI, but quite a lot about how correlated everything becomes when you're living through a transformation. We see patterns because patterns were genuinely everywhere.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Alibaba Singles Day sales” vs “AI papers published on arXiv per year” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.