US dog treat and chew market revenueUS pet insurance policies in force
As dog treat revenue has grown, pet insurance policies have multiplied, a correlation of 0.988 that is less spurious than most because both metrics are measuring the same underlying phenomenon: Americans spending more money on their dogs. The treats arrive, the policies activate, and the chart draws a line through both that is basically a pet industry income statement in disguise.
Dog treat revenue grew from about 3 billion to over 11 billion dollars between 2005 and 2022. Pet insurance grew from about 850,000 to over 4.4 million policies. Both are driven by the pet humanization trend: Americans treating their animals as family members, spending premium prices on treats, and purchasing insurance against veterinary costs. The shared variable is dog ownership itself and the cultural shift toward treating pets as dependents with healthcare needs. This correlation is among the least spurious on the site—both metrics are measuring the same market from different angles.
Eighteen years of dog treats and pet insurance is one of the most directly connected correlations on this site: both measure the same consumer spending more on the same pet. More dogs in more homes means more treats bought and more policies purchased. The treat is consumed, the premium is paid, and the correlation is simply a dog owner's annual budget expressed in two line items. The good boy gets both. The scatter plot confirms.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “US dog treat and chew market revenue” vs “US pet insurance policies in force” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.