Streaming service subscriptionsNew housing construction starts
New housing construction starts and streaming service subscriptions correlated at 0.97 between 2007 and 2022, suggesting that every time a foundation was poured somewhere in America, someone in the resulting structure immediately subscribed to Netflix. This is, architecturally speaking, entirely plausible — new homes require content, and content requires new homes to be watched in. The years 2008 and 2009, when both numbers collapsed simultaneously, represent the period when Americans were neither building houses nor subscribing to streaming services, possibly because they were too busy being in a financial crisis to do either.
Both metrics crashed during the 2008-2009 financial crisis and then recovered and grew through the 2010s, creating a shared trajectory that produces a high correlation. Housing starts fell from over 2 million in 2005 to under 600,000 in 2009 before recovering; streaming subscriptions grew from essentially zero with Netflix's 2007 streaming launch to hundreds of millions by the 2020s. The shared driver is broader macroeconomic health: when consumer confidence and disposable income grow, people both form new households and spend on entertainment subscriptions. The post-2020 pandemic period created a divergence as housing surged while streaming growth plateaued, but across the full period the correlation holds.
Macroeconomic cycles leave their fingerprints on every consumer market simultaneously. A correlation built on a shared recession and recovery is describing the economy, not a relationship.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Streaming service subscriptions” vs “New housing construction starts” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.