It will surprise absolutely no one that MrBeast's subscriber growth tracks almost perfectly with global spending on influencer marketing, given that he is, in a sense, both the product and the proof of concept. The correlation is 0.975, which is less a statistical discovery and more a tautology dressed up in a scatter plot. It is like discovering that umbrella sales correlate with rain, except the umbrella is also the rain.
Global influencer marketing spending grew from about 1.7 billion dollars in 2016 to over 21 billion by 2025, as brands shifted advertising budgets from traditional media to creator partnerships. MrBeast is both a beneficiary and a driver of this shift—his channels generate hundreds of millions of dollars in brand deals and ad revenue, and his success has convinced entire marketing departments that creator-led campaigns deliver better ROI than television spots. The correlation is almost uncomfortably direct: as brands spent more on influencers, the most successful influencer grew proportionally. The shared variable is not a confounding third factor but the actual money flowing from one trend to the other.
Ten data points of influencer spending and MrBeast growth is one of the least spurious correlations on this entire website, which makes it something of a disappointment from an entertainment standpoint. The money went in, the subscribers came out, and the scatter plot drew itself. Sometimes a correlation is just a receipt.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “MrBeast YouTube subscribers” vs “Global influencer marketing spending” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.