Cost of a 30-second Super Bowl adBabies named Luna (US)
The cost of a 30-second Super Bowl advertisement and the popularity of the baby name Luna have grown together for eighteen years, which either means advertisers are paying for something mystical, or that both are simply expensive things that became more expensive. A Super Bowl ad cost around $2.5 million for 30 seconds in 2005 and around $6.5 million in 2022. Luna climbed from obscurity to a top-10 name. Both are now things you cannot afford to ignore.
Super Bowl ad rates have risen continuously since the 1990s, tracking TV viewership, media fragmentation (making mass-reach moments more valuable), and broader advertising market inflation. Luna's rise as a baby name reflects cultural trends including the Harry Potter series, celebrity baby naming patterns, and a broad shift toward celestial and nature-inspired names that accelerated through the 2010s. Both are monotonically increasing series across the 2005-2022 window — Super Bowl costs never meaningfully dropped, and Luna only grew — and any two such series will correlate strongly over 18 data points.
Naming a child and pricing a commercial slot are decisions made in entirely separate rooms by entirely separate people, yet they trace the same line. That is not a mystery to solve; it is a reminder that time creates apparent order from genuine chaos.
As an Amazon Associate, getspurious.com earns from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Want to learn more about why correlations like “Cost of a 30-second Super Bowl ad” vs “Babies named Luna (US)” don't prove causation? Read our guide to statistical thinking.